Side by side
FlashFXP vs TurboFTP
Both stand on ftp and sftp clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Windows
Choose FlashFXP if you need Windows-based, multi-protocol transfers with synchronization and scheduled automation. Look elsewhere if you require a listed non-Windows platform or a free plan.
Visit FlashFXP Paid Windows
TurboFTP covers common transfer protocols and adds synchronization, scheduling, and automation. Its annual paid tiers scale task capacity from one to unlimited.
Visit TurboFTPThe facts
| FlashFXP | TurboFTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Windows | Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | TurboFTP Lite: $49.95 a year |
| Plans published | 1 | 5 |
| Maker | FlashFXP | Not published |
| Website | flashfxp.com | turboftp.com |
| On ftp and sftp clients | #31 of 36 | #35 of 36 |
FlashFXP: what it does well
- Supports multiple transfer protocols
- Synchronizes files
- Schedules recurring transfers
- Automates transfer workflows
- Portable version available
What to know first
- Windows is the listed platform
- No free plan
TurboFTP: what it does well
- Supports FTP, FTPS, and SFTP
- File synchronization included
- Scheduled and automated transfers
- 30-day trial listed
- Higher plans allow unlimited tasks
What to know first
- Windows only
- No free plan
- Plans are annual subscriptions
- Lite allows one GUI task at a time
Alternatives to FlashFXP Alternatives to TurboFTP The whole list