FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Firebird vs SQLite

Both stand on relational databases. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Firebird

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

Firebird combines broad SQL capabilities with several deployment choices and a no-fee free plan. Check the maintained release series and recovery limits when choosing a version and backup approach.

Visit Firebird

SQLite

Free plan Open source AndroidAPIiPhone+5

SQLite provides an embedded database with broad SQL capabilities and a simple single-file format. Its one-writer-per-file limit is important when evaluating it for write-heavy workloads.

Visit SQLite

The facts

FirebirdSQLite
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedYes
Runs onLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, WindowsAndroid, API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planEnterprise subscription: €199 a monthSee the plans
Plans published210
MakerNot publishedSQLite
Websitefirebirdsql.orgsqlite.org
On relational databases#7 of 38#3 of 38

Firebird: what it does well

  • Free plan includes commercial distribution.
  • Reader access usually does not block writers.
  • Offers four deployment architectures.
  • Online and incremental backup options are available.
  • Drivers cover Java, .NET, Python, and more.

What to know first

  • Firebird 2.5 and earlier series are discontinued.
  • Point-in-time recovery is only partially supported.
  • Enterprise subscription is €199 a month.

SQLite: what it does well

  • A complete database is stored in one cross-platform file.
  • Supports JSON and window functions.
  • Transactions remain durable through crashes and power failures.
  • Free for commercial and private use.

What to know first

  • Only one writer can use a database file at a time.
  • The project recommends it for content below a terabyte.
  • Private email and technical support are paid options.

Alternatives to Firebird Alternatives to SQLite The whole list