FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Fink vs Nala

Both stand on package managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Fink

Free plan Mac

Fink provides a structured way to install Unix software on macOS while isolating packages from the base system. Installation requirements and X11 needs matter for users selecting graphical or source-built packages.

Visit Fink

Nala

Free plan Linux

Nala combines familiar APT package operations with mirror selection, download verification, configurable terminal output, and recorded transaction history. Check your distribution version first because the described installation does not support Ubuntu 18.04, Debian Buster, or older releases.

Visit Nala

The facts

FinkNala
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onMacLinux
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitefinkproject.orggitlab.com
On package managers#69 of 93#65 of 93

Fink: what it does well

  • Free and open source
  • Dependency resolution for required libraries
  • Separate package tree
  • Supports Intel and Apple arm64 development branches
  • Documentation, mailing lists, and IRC support

What to know first

  • macOS only
  • Xcode required before installation
  • Most graphical packages require X11
  • No current binary installer for macOS 10.6–10.15

Nala: what it does well

  • Free and open source
  • Supports dependency resolution
  • Parallel downloads with hash verification
  • Transaction history supports undo and redo
  • Automatic or interactive mirror selection

What to know first

  • Linux only
  • Does not work through described installation on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Does not work through described installation on Debian Buster
  • Package-changing commands require root privileges

Alternatives to Fink Alternatives to Nala The whole list