Side by side
FilePizza vs ShareKit
Both stand on file transfer services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
FilePizza focuses on direct, browser-based sharing with multiple-download and password options. Its main operational constraint is keeping the uploader’s browser open until completion.
Visit FilePizza Free plan Web
ShareKit combines file sharing, editable links, QR codes, embeds, and analytics. Its retention periods and unlisted-link access model are important when planning distribution.
Visit ShareKitThe facts
| FilePizza | ShareKit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Pro: $9 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | file.pizza | sharekit.app |
| On file transfer services | #59 of 105 | #55 of 105 |
FilePizza: what it does well
- Direct browser-to-browser transfers
- Multiple downloaders can use one URL
- Optional password protection
- Encrypted WebRTC communications
- Works on most mobile browsers
What to know first
- Uploader must keep browser open
- File size depends on browser capability
- Closing browser stops new URL downloads
- No free trial listed
ShareKit: what it does well
- Tracks views, downloads, and QR scans
- Supports multiple file types
- Keeps URLs during file replacement
- Provides Markdown, HTML, and BBCode embeds
- Offers a free plan
What to know first
- Unlisted links are accessible to anyone with them
- Free files are limited to 20MB
- Guest links last seven days
- Free managed links last 30 days
Alternatives to FilePizza Alternatives to ShareKit The whole list