Side by side
FileDuck vs Smash
Both stand on file transfer services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1
FileDuck focuses on direct, resumable file transfers with browser and desktop options. Its free tier covers limited transfers, while paid plans remove transfer and file-size limits.
Visit FileDuck
Free plan API
Smash offers no-sign-up transfers alongside paid plans with longer availability and larger storage allowances. Buyers should compare user counts, transfer limits, storage, and the stated VAT exclusion.
Visit SmashThe facts
| FileDuck | Smash | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows | API |
| Lowest paid plan | Pro Yearly: €110 a year | Pro: $10 a month |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Smash |
| Website | fileduck.com | fromsmash.com |
| On file transfer services | #29 of 105 | #33 of 105 |
FileDuck: what it does well
- Direct device-to-device transfers
- Downloads can begin during upload
- Interrupted transfers can resume
- Free plan includes 10GB
- Linux, macOS, web, and Windows support
What to know first
- Both parties must remain online
- Free plan has a 10GB allowance
- Relay traffic may be used when direct connection fails
- Service retains transfer metadata
Smash: what it does well
- Free transfers require no sign-up
- Download tracking available
- Custom branding supported
- API access and desktop app
- Team plan supports 10 to 50 accounts
What to know first
- Free transfers limited to 2 GB each
- Free availability lasts seven days
- Pro and Team exclude VAT
Alternatives to FileDuck Alternatives to Smash The whole list