Side by side
FerrFlow vs Relic
Both stand on release automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2
FerrFlow covers versioning and release tasks for single repositories and monorepos, with multiple forge and CI options. Its single-binary design and stated lack of user-data collection may suit teams seeking a CI-oriented release tool.
Visit FerrFlow
Free plan Open source AndroidAPIiPhone+5
Relic combines cross-device clipboard history, varied search options, and local AI features. Its Free plan has device and storage limits, while self-hosting offers an alternative for users who want to run the sync server on their own hardware.
Visit RelicThe facts
| FerrFlow | Relic | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Pro: $5 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | ferrflow.com | relic.space |
| On release automation tools | #3 of 34 | #1 of 34 |
FerrFlow: what it does well
- Supports four versioning strategies
- Supports GitHub, GitLab, and self-hosted forges
- Includes several installation and CI options
- MIT licensed, with a free plan
What to know first
- No plugins
- No account or API endpoint for user data handling
- No graphical editing feature is listed
Relic: what it does well
- Searches text, meaning, dates, and screenshot text
- Local AI handles tagging, OCR, and semantic search
- Open-source apps, sync server, and self-host stack
- Free self-hosting under AGPL-3.0
What to know first
- Phone capture requires sharing, a shortcut, or tile
- Free hosted plan is limited to three devices and 250 MB
- No free trial
Alternatives to FerrFlow Alternatives to Relic The whole list