Side by side
FeatherCI vs Runnable
Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
FeatherCI provides a self-hosted CI system with containerized builds, visual workflow controls, and broad Git authentication. Its free model and multiple installation paths suit teams prepared to operate the infrastructure themselves.
Visit FeatherCI Paid APILinuxWeb
Runnable combines hosted GitHub Actions execution with migration help, isolated runners, and operational tooling. Its Linux-only runtime and paid plans are important constraints to check before choosing a tier.
Visit RunnableThe facts
| FeatherCI | Runnable | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web | API, Linux, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Hobby: $5 a month |
| Plans published | None | 5 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | featherci.dev | runnable.cloud |
| On continuous integration software | #51 of 58 | #55 of 58 |
FeatherCI: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Isolated Docker build steps
- Visual dependencies and approval gates
- Encrypted, masked secrets
- Distributed worker support
What to know first
- No hosted option
- Requires a Docker socket mount
- Default parallel limit is two steps
- Self-hosting requires installation
Runnable: what it does well
- Runs jobs on isolated, single-use Linux x64 machines
- Migration assistant can open a parallel-pilot pull request
- Provides searchable logs, artifacts, cache, and approvals
- Short-lived, job-scoped repository credentials
- Hosted plans include MCP agent access
What to know first
- Linux x64 runners only
- Native job containers are unsupported
- No free plan
- Enterprise pricing is custom
Alternatives to FeatherCI Alternatives to Runnable The whole list