Side by side
FeatherCI vs Harness CI
Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
FeatherCI provides a self-hosted CI system with containerized builds, visual workflow controls, and broad Git authentication. Its free model and multiple installation paths suit teams prepared to operate the infrastructure themselves.
Visit FeatherCI
Free plan Web
Choose Harness CI if you need web-based CI with hosted or self-hosted runner options and pull request checks.
Visit Harness CIThe facts
| FeatherCI | Harness CI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | featherci.dev | harness.io |
| On continuous integration software | #51 of 58 | #47 of 58 |
FeatherCI: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Isolated Docker build steps
- Visual dependencies and approval gates
- Encrypted, masked secrets
- Distributed worker support
What to know first
- No hosted option
- Requires a Docker socket mount
- Default parallel limit is two steps
- Self-hosting requires installation
Harness CI: what it does well
- Free Plan costs nothing.
- Includes Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos.
- Supports hosted use and self-hosted runners.
- Offers pull request checks and artifact or dependency caching.
- Essentials bundles CI, CD, IaC, and security.
What to know first
- Free Plan support is community support.
Alternatives to FeatherCI Alternatives to Harness CI The whole list