FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

FastTrackML vs Sacred

Both stand on ml experiment tracking software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

FastTrackML

Paid APILinuxMac+3

FastTrackML provides MLflow-oriented experiment logging, web interfaces, and several self-hosted deployment paths. Its archived repository and stated successor should be considered before choosing it for new work.

Visit FastTrackML

Sacred

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Sacred provides experiment configuration, run logging, reproducibility controls, and several viewing integrations. Its Python focus and self-hosted setup should guide tool selection.

Visit Sacred

The facts

FastTrackMLSacred
Free planNot publishedYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsLinux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitefasttrackml.iogithub.com
On ml experiment tracking software#28 of 39#24 of 39

FastTrackML: what it does well

  • Open-source Apache License 2.0 project
  • MLflow-compatible drop-in replacement API
  • Supports pip, Docker, and installation scripts
  • Modern and Classic user interfaces
  • API and SDK access available

What to know first

  • Repository archived March 31, 2026
  • GitHub repository is read-only
  • Homepage names mlflow-go as successor

Sacred: what it does well

  • Free MIT-licensed open-source project
  • Command-line parameter changes and variants
  • Observers record configuration and machine details
  • Automatic seeding supports reproducibility
  • Artifact tracking and API access

What to know first

  • Designed for Python experiments
  • No free trial is offered
  • NumPy and PyMongo features are optional dependencies

Alternatives to FastTrackML Alternatives to Sacred The whole list