Side by side
Faro vs FTP Rush
Both stand on ftp and sftp clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Faro combines file management across server and cloud backends with shell access and optional agent integration. Note the read-only HTTP(S) support and unsigned builds before choosing it.
Visit Faro
Free plan AndroidiPhoneLinux+2
FTP Rush offers broad protocol and service support alongside scheduled and scripted transfer options. Check the standard Windows requirement if that is your intended version.
Visit FTP RushThe facts
| Faro | FTP Rush | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Android, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | wftpserver.com |
| On ftp and sftp clients | #7 of 36 | #3 of 36 |
Faro: what it does well
- Supports a broad range of transfer and storage protocols.
- Includes directory and continuous folder sync.
- CLI reuses saved GUI profiles.
- Agent Bridge defaults to per-command approval and keeps an audit log.
What to know first
- HTTP(S) sources are read-only.
- Builds are unsigned.
- macOS builds are not notarized.
FTP Rush: what it does well
- Supports FTP, FTPS, SFTP, WebDAV, and cloud services
- Transfers between servers using different protocols
- Includes scheduling, synchronization, and automation
- Portable version can run without installation
- Supports HTTP and SOCKS5 proxies
What to know first
- Standard Windows download requires .NET Framework 4.6.2 or later
- No paid limits are stated
Alternatives to Faro Alternatives to FTP Rush The whole list