Side by side
Express vs NestJS CLI
Both stand on web frameworks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose Express if you need a free, open-source JavaScript backend framework with SSR and can manage self-hosted deployment. Look elsewhere if an included ORM or built-in authentication is a requirement.
Visit Express Free plan
NestJS CLI covers project setup, code generation, building, and deployment-related commands for Nest applications. Check the Node.js requirements, especially the higher minimums for several schematics, before using it.
Visit NestJS CLIThe facts
| Express | NestJS CLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Not published |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | expressjs.com | nestjs.com |
| On web frameworks | #9 of 31 | #5 of 31 |
Express: what it does well
- Free to use with a free plan.
- Open-source license model.
- Supports server-side rendering.
- Uses JavaScript as its primary language.
- Available on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
What to know first
- Deployment target is self-hosted.
- No included ORM.
- No built-in authentication.
NestJS CLI: what it does well
- Free and MIT-licensed.
- Scaffolds projects with ESM or CommonJS options.
- Supports standard and monorepo modes.
- Can generate or modify files from schematics.
- Available through npm or npx.
What to know first
- CLI binary requires Node.js v20.11 or later.
- Several schematics require newer Node.js versions.
- Node.js must include internationalization support (ICU).
Alternatives to Express Alternatives to NestJS CLI The whole list