Side by side
Expo Application Services vs Jetpack Compose
Both stand on mobile app development platforms. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Choose EAS if you need cloud services for Android and iOS builds, signing, and store submission. Its free plan includes monthly build and CI/CD allowances, while paid plans provide larger MAU allowances and build credit. Look elsewhere if your required concurrency or usage exceeds the plan limits and the additional usage costs are unsuitable.
Visit Expo Application Services Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit Jetpack Compose The facts
| Expo Application Services | Jetpack Compose | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter: $19 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | expo.dev | developer.android.com |
| On mobile app development platforms | #18 of 37 | #22 of 37 |
Expo Application Services: what it does well
- Supports Android and iOS targets.
- Includes signing management and store submission.
- Hosted macOS is available.
- Free plan includes 15 builds for each mobile platform.
- Paid plans include build credit.
What to know first
- Free plan limits CI/CD workflows to 60 minutes.
- Free plan allows one concurrent build.
- Paid plans add additional usage costs.
Jetpack Compose: what it does well
Alternatives to Expo Application Services Alternatives to Jetpack Compose The whole list