Side by side
EvoMaster vs HTTPie
Both stand on api testing tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
EvoMaster provides free fuzz-based test generation across several API types and programming languages. Account for the white-box driver requirement and the lack of automatic external-service mocking when planning its use.
Visit EvoMaster Free plan Open source LinuxMacWeb+1
HTTPie offers command-line API testing alongside a graphical app for desktop and web. The CLI plan is open-source, while the Desktop and Web plan is in public beta; both are listed as free.
Visit HTTPieThe facts
| EvoMaster | HTTPie | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | HTTPie for Web: $10 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | httpie.io |
| On api testing tools | #6 of 34 | #2 of 34 |
EvoMaster: what it does well
- Targets REST, GraphQL, and RPC APIs.
- Generates tests in Java, Kotlin, Python, and JavaScript.
- Uses more than 30 oracles to check for faults.
- Can run in GitHub Actions.
- Project says it has no telemetry.
What to know first
- White-box testing requires a manually written driver.
- Does not yet automatically mock external services.
- REST APIs need an OpenAPI schema.
- OpenAPI 3.2 support is on hold.
HTTPie: what it does well
- Supports GraphQL and a broad set of CLI request options.
- Desktop and Web app works offline without an account.
- Desktop app available for Mac, Windows, and Linux.
- CLI installation options cover any operating system.
What to know first
- Desktop and Web app is in public beta.
- Security measures are not guaranteed to prevent every unauthorized breach.
Alternatives to EvoMaster Alternatives to HTTPie The whole list