Side by side
Eureka vs GitHub Advanced Security
Both stand on devsecops platforms. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxWeb
Choose Eureka if your software team needs to prioritize AppSec findings and keep fixes, decisions, and evidence in one workflow. Look elsewhere if you need more than five Team seats or depend on a scanner format that Eureka does not support; Enterprise pricing is custom.
Visit Eureka Free plan Web
Visit GitHub Advanced Security The facts
| Eureka | GitHub Advanced Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Team: $125 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 2 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | eurekadevsecops.com | github.com |
| On devsecops platforms | #5 of 25 | #9 of 25 |
Eureka: what it does well
- Built-in SAST code and SCA dependency checks.
- Combines findings, remediation, decisions, and audit history.
- Accepts supported third-party scanner findings and SARIF imports.
- Team includes GitHub workflow support.
- Trial lasts 30 days and requires no credit card.
What to know first
- Team is limited to five seats.
- Extra repositories and scan volume may require usage credits.
- Supported SARIF imports do not cover every vendor or format.
GitHub Advanced Security: what it does well
Alternatives to Eureka Alternatives to GitHub Advanced Security The whole list