Side by side
Enzo vs Shapeyard
Both stand on 3d modeling software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxWindows
Enzo offers free procedural modeling with an embeddable engine and flexible downloads. Its early-alpha status and unsupported Mac platform matter when choosing it for a production workflow.
Visit Enzo Free plan iPhoneMac
Shapeyard provides an accessible modeling workflow with print and game-engine exports. Its free app is suited to personal projects, while optional purchases and the non-commercial restriction define important boundaries.
Visit ShapeyardThe facts
| Enzo | Shapeyard | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Windows | iPhone, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | enzo3d.com | shapeyard.org |
| On 3d modeling software | #85 of 147 | #81 of 147 |
Enzo: what it does well
- Free MIT-licensed software
- Node-based procedural geometry
- Unified context for multiple tools
- Engine can embed in games or pipelines
- No seat limits
What to know first
- Early alpha stage
- Not intended for production pipelines
- Mac is not officially supported
- Requires OpenGL 3.3-capable GPU
Shapeyard: what it does well
- Free app available
- OBJ and STL export
- Layer, stencil, and PBR tools
- Compatible with named 3D slicers
- Exports for major game tools
What to know first
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- Complete security cannot be guaranteed
- Data may be stored outside the user’s country
Alternatives to Enzo Alternatives to Shapeyard The whole list