FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

dnSpyEx vs FlowStorm

Both stand on debuggers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

dnSpyEx

Free plan LinuxWindows

dnSpyEx combines debugging, decompilation, editing, and assembly analysis at no cost. Its dynamic-method limitation and Wine-based Linux use are important constraints.

Visit dnSpyEx

FlowStorm

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

FlowStorm combines execution recording with stepping, inspection, visualizations, and thread-event timelines for Clojure and ClojureScript. Check its runtime requirements and the async/await limitation against your project before choosing it.

Visit FlowStorm

The facts

dnSpyExFlowStorm
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, WindowsLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comflow-storm.org
On debuggers#6 of 27#2 of 27

dnSpyEx: what it does well

  • Debugs .NET Framework, .NET, and Unity assemblies
  • Edits C#, Visual Basic, and low-level IL
  • Includes decompilers, disassembly, and assembly analysis
  • Free and GPLv3-licensed

What to know first

  • Dynamic methods cannot be debugged
  • Linux use is through Wine, not native support
  • Unity game debugging also requires the Unity Mono repository

FlowStorm: what it does well

  • Records execution without breakpoints or code changes
  • Provides stepping, value inspection, and exception debugging
  • Timeline shows interleaving of thread instructions
  • Free and open source
  • Supports plugins and real-time visualizations

What to know first

  • Requires JDK 17 or later and Clojure 1.10.0 or later
  • Vanilla FlowStorm lacks support for the specified async/await feature

Alternatives to dnSpyEx Alternatives to FlowStorm The whole list