Side by side
Disa vs Stackfield
Both stand on team chat apps. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Android
Disa centralizes several messaging services with contact-based threads, media tools, and backups. Its legacy status and limited ongoing development should be considered before relying on it for new messaging workflows.
Visit Disa
Free trial AndroidAPIiPhone+3
Stackfield brings communication and project work together across major desktop and mobile platforms. Its paid model, regional data handling, and sector-focused features may fit organizations with structured collaboration needs.
Visit StackfieldThe facts
| Disa | Stackfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android | Android, API, iPhone, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Starter: €9 a month |
| Plans published | None | 6 |
| Maker | Disa | Stackfield |
| Website | disa.im | stackfield.com |
| On team chat apps | #56 of 63 | #52 of 63 |
Disa: what it does well
- Combines multiple services into contact threads
- SMS and MMS supported out of the box
- Supports group chats and rich media
- Backups can use device or Google account
- Direct connections avoid intermediate server hops
What to know first
- Available release is no longer actively developed
- Legacy version may have reduced functionality
- Android is the only listed platform
Stackfield: what it does well
- Combines chat, conferencing, and project tools
- Supports web, desktop, and mobile platforms
- EU processing and German data centers
- Includes guest access and channels
- 14-day trial requires no credit card
What to know first
- No free plan
- API processing limited to one request per second
- Some API settings require Enterprise
- Trial conferences initially limited to three minutes
Alternatives to Disa Alternatives to Stackfield The whole list