Side by side
devpi vs Gemstash
Both stand on artifact repository software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWeb
devpi brings package indexes, command-line management, test integration, and optional web search into a Python package workflow. Its offline mirror and self-hosting options may appeal to teams that want control over package access.
Visit devpi Free plan Self-hosted
Gemstash combines upstream proxying, indefinite gem caching, private-gem hosting, and configurable storage for Ruby workflows. Teams should address its default unauthenticated access and limited server configuration during setup.
Visit GemstashThe facts
| devpi | Gemstash | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | devpi.net | github.com |
| On artifact repository software | #32 of 64 | #36 of 64 |
devpi: what it does well
- Indexes can inherit packages from other indexes or PyPI.
- Client supports uploads, installs, index management, and tox tests.
- Cached mirror can be used offline after initial fill.
- Searchable web interface is available through devpi-web.
- Open source and free.
What to know first
- No free trial.
- Self-hosting requires running the server.
Gemstash: what it does well
- Free and open source under MIT License
- Supports multiple upstream gem sources
- Fine-grained API-key permissions
- Several database adapters available
- Health endpoint reports service status
What to know first
- Private access is unauthenticated by default
- Simpler mirror setup needs Bundler 1.11.0+
- Server configuration is not customizable
- Self-hosted deployment required
Alternatives to devpi Alternatives to Gemstash The whole list