Side by side
Defraginator vs Shake
Both stand on disk defragmentation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMacWindows
Choose Defraginator if you need to defragment supported ROM or firmware images on removable media and can meet its free-space requirement. It suits users comfortable with OS-specific permissions and, to build and run the project, the .NET 10 SDK.
Visit Defraginator Free plan Linux
Shake provides configurable file defragmentation with preview support and Linux installation guidance. Its defaults, root requirement, and extended-attribute recommendation should be considered before use.
Visit ShakeThe facts
| Defraginator | Shake | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | vleu.net |
| On disk defragmentation software | #18 of 20 | #14 of 20 |
Defraginator: what it does well
- Targets four selectable `.bin` file sizes.
- Scans mounted removable volumes recursively.
- Supports Linux, macOS, and Windows.
- Verifies physical contiguity before reporting success.
- GPL-3.0 licensed and free to use.
What to know first
- Only processes `.bin` files at selected sizes.
- Requires a free gap at least as large as the file.
- Windows cluster moves require administrator rights.
- Requires the .NET 10 SDK to build and run.
Shake: what it does well
- Free GNU/Linux defragmenter
- Runs while the system is in use
- Offers preview mode without changes
- Supports several Linux installation methods
- Can order piped MP3 files
What to know first
- Requires root access
- Files over 95 MB skipped by default
- Newer files skipped by default
- `user_xattr` is recommended for efficiency
Alternatives to Defraginator Alternatives to Shake The whole list