Side by side
Dagobert vs OpenText Endpoint Forensics & Response
Both stand on incident response software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Choose Dagobert if your response team needs a free, self-hosted workspace for managing investigations, evidence, and reports across cases. Teams looking for a commercial offering or support tier should look elsewhere; deployment also calls for restricted team access behind an HTTPS reverse proxy.
Visit Dagobert Paid WebWindows
Visit OpenText Endpoint Forensics & Response The facts
| Dagobert | OpenText Endpoint Forensics & Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | opentext.com |
| On incident response software | #17 of 21 | #21 of 21 |
Dagobert: what it does well
- Separate cases support role-based access control.
- Cross-case dashboard includes a MITRE ATT&CK heatmap.
- Tracks evidence, indicators, timelines, assets, malware, and tasks.
- Generates reports from user-provided office document templates.
- Can enrich indicators and exchange timelines with other tools.
What to know first
- The project describes no commercial offering, pricing, or support tier.
- Self-hosting is the deployment option described.
- The README warns against direct internet exposure.
- The repository's releases page states that there are no releases.
OpenText Endpoint Forensics & Response: what it does well
Alternatives to Dagobert Alternatives to OpenText Endpoint Forensics & Response The whole list