FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

cypress-axe vs tota11y

Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

cypress-axe

Free plan Web

cypress-axe adds configurable axe-core accessibility assertions to Cypress tests, including scoped checks, impact filters, retries, and callbacks. Teams needing manual review or remediation guidance will need other tools.

Visit cypress-axe

tota11y

Free plan ExtensionWeb

tota11y presents common accessibility findings in a form intended for content creators and editors. Its page-level modules are broad, but it should be treated as a visualization aid rather than a complete audit.

Visit tota11y

The facts

cypress-axetota11y
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWebExtension, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On accessibility testing software#99 of 169#103 of 169

cypress-axe: what it does well

  • Automates WCAG 2.0 checks
  • Supports document or scoped DOM analysis
  • Filters violations by impact
  • Retries checks for dynamic content
  • MIT-licensed and free

What to know first

  • No manual review tools
  • No mobile testing support
  • No remediation guidance
  • Requires Cypress and axe-core installation

tota11y: what it does well

  • Free and open source
  • Works through bookmarklet or Chromium extension
  • Covers contrast, alt text, and focus order
  • Includes headings, labels, landmarks, and ARIA checks
  • Browser instructions name Firefox, Chromium, and Safari

What to know first

  • Not designed to check every accessibility issue
  • Content Security Policy can block the bookmarklet
  • Focus Order’s guessed sequence is not guaranteed

Alternatives to cypress-axe Alternatives to tota11y The whole list