Side by side
CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management vs FairCRQ
Both stand on cyber risk quantification (crq) tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APISelf-hosted
Choose CyanoRisk if your organization needs API discovery, risk assessment, and remediation in a self-hosted deployment. Its API context, sensitive-data classification, and risk scoring bring several assessment dimensions together. Teams should look elsewhere if they need a published price; the stated evaluation is a six-week proof of concept on customer-provisioned infrastructure.
Visit CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management Free plan Web
Visit FairCRQ The facts
| CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management | FairCRQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cyanofabric.com | faircrq.com |
| On cyber risk quantification (crq) tools | #2 of 8 | #1 of 8 |
CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management: what it does well
- Discovers and assesses REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and SOAP APIs.
- Identifies shadow and zombie APIs and classifies sensitive data.
- Connects API risks to business services, applications, and identities.
- Runs on customer infrastructure with no telemetry or phone-home.
- Routes findings with SLAs and closure evidence.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- A proof of concept requires customer-provisioned infrastructure.
FairCRQ: what it does well
Alternatives to CyanoRisk API Security Posture Management Alternatives to FairCRQ The whole list