Side by side
Cursor Bugbot vs HackerOne Code
Both stand on code review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial APIWeb
Bugbot combines automated pull-request analysis with configurable rules, comments, and optional autofix. Its usage billing and review-size limit are important considerations for teams planning regular code reviews.
Visit Cursor Bugbot
Paid APIWeb
H1 Code combines automated code analysis, agent-based triage, human review, and tailored remediation. Its repository coverage and stated encryption and deletion practices are useful, while pricing requires an inquiry.
Visit HackerOne CodeThe facts
| Cursor Bugbot | HackerOne Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Web | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cursor.com | hackerone.com |
| On code review software | #46 of 51 | #50 of 51 |
Cursor Bugbot: what it does well
- Reviews pull-request diffs automatically or manually
- Explains findings and suggests fixes
- Supports custom repository and project rules
- Offers Autofix through a Cloud Agent
- Connects to major code hosts
What to know first
- No free plan is listed
- Billing is usage-based
- Very large pull requests are skipped
- Extra reviews use on-demand spend
HackerOne Code: what it does well
- Analyzes commits and pull requests
- Human review ranks critical findings
- Supports major languages and frameworks
- Integrates four listed code hosts
- Deletes scanned code within 24 hours
What to know first
- Pricing requires contacting a security expert
- AI frontier-model analysis is optional
- No free plan is listed
Alternatives to Cursor Bugbot Alternatives to HackerOne Code The whole list