Side by side
Currents vs FailBrief
Both stand on ci failure analysis and flaky test tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial APISelf-hostedWeb
Currents combines shared Playwright diagnostics, CI orchestration, flaky-test controls, and reporting. Its paid plans and listed retention limits should be checked against your test volume and data needs.
Visit Currents Free plan Web
Visit FailBrief The facts
| Currents | FailBrief | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Scale: $49 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | currents.dev | failbrief.com |
| On ci failure analysis and flaky test tools | #12 of 21 | #16 of 21 |
Currents: what it does well
- Stores traces, screenshots, videos, and test history
- Balances Playwright tests across CI machines
- Detects flaky tests with quarantine actions
- Provides scheduled performance and failure reports
- Offers web, API, and self-hosted deployment
What to know first
- No free plan is listed
- Scale costs 49.00 USD monthly
- Passed-test artifacts retain for seven days
- Data is hosted in AWS us-east-1, USA
FailBrief: what it does well
Alternatives to Currents Alternatives to FailBrief The whole list