Side by side
Cucumber.js vs Karma
Both stand on javascript testing frameworks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
Cucumber.js gives Node.js teams a way to connect plain-text Gherkin scenarios to code and check the results. Note that reports published with `--publish` are public and deleted after 24 hours.
Visit Cucumber.js Free plan AndroidiPhoneLinux+4
Karma offers browser-based test runs, file watching, and a plugin model for frameworks and launchers. Its deprecated status and limited support for new development are central considerations.
Visit KarmaThe facts
| Cucumber.js | Karma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | Android, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cucumber.io | karma-runner.github.io |
| On javascript testing frameworks | #1 of 23 | #3 of 23 |
Cucumber.js: what it does well
- Free and open source.
- Runs feature files from the command line.
- Supports continuous integration and parallel execution.
- Report plugins show scenario outcomes.
- Works with browser automation tools such as Selenium WebDriver.
What to know first
- Requires Node.js and npm or Yarn.
- Global installation does not work with support files.
- Published reports are publicly accessible.
- Cucumber.js is not a browser automation tool.
Karma: what it does well
- Runs tests in configured browsers and reports results
- Watches files and reruns tests after changes
- Plugins support multiple frameworks and browser launchers
- Includes CI integration guides
- Free and MIT-licensed
What to know first
- Deprecated; no new features or general bug fixes
- Primarily designed for low-level unit testing
- Requires Node.js
Alternatives to Cucumber.js Alternatives to Karma The whole list