FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

CppUTest vs Kotest

Both stand on unit testing. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CppUTest

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

CppUTest provides a portable C/C++ testing framework with assertions, mocking, memory checks, and CI output. Users building from packages should note that MakefileWorker.mk is limited to source builds.

Visit CppUTest

Kotest

Free plan AndroidiPhoneLinux+3

Kotest offers test styles, assertions, and property checks across a broad set of Kotlin targets. Its standalone assertions library can also fit projects that use a different test framework.

Visit Kotest

The facts

CppUTestKotest
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, WindowsAndroid, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitecpputest.github.iokotest.io
On unit testing#1 of 32#5 of 32

CppUTest: what it does well

  • Supports C and C++ tests
  • Includes mocking and memory leak detection
  • Provides JUnit-style and TeamCity XML output
  • Offers multiple documented build and package options
  • BSD-3-Clause license

What to know first

  • MakefileWorker.mk is not supported by pre-packaged installs
  • Project support is directed to Google Groups and GitHub issues

Kotest: what it does well

  • Free framework with assertions and property testing.
  • Offers over 350 matchers and collection inspectors.
  • Supports parameterized tests and parallel execution.
  • Property testing is supported across all targets.
  • Assertions can be used with JUnit or Spock.

What to know first

  • Built-in mocks are not included.
  • Supported languages list only Kotlin.

Alternatives to CppUTest Alternatives to Kotest The whole list