Side by side
Coverlet vs OpenClover
Both stand on test coverage tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Coverlet provides several .NET test and build integrations, with report formats and options varying by driver. Check package compatibility with your test platform before choosing an integration.
Visit Coverlet Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1
OpenClover combines multiple coverage views, configurable metrics and report formats with tools for test selection. Check the Groovy IDE limitation and the supported runtime versions against your setup.
Visit OpenCloverThe facts
| Coverlet | OpenClover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | openclover.org |
| On test coverage tools | #7 of 27 | #11 of 27 |
Coverlet: what it does well
- Measures line, branch, and method coverage
- Integrates with MTP, .NET global tool, VSTest, and MSBuild
- MTP driver supports four report formats
- Offers coverage threshold validation, depending on driver
- Free under the MIT License
What to know first
- Collector and MSBuild packages are incompatible with MTP projects
- MTP package requires .NET 8.0 SDK or newer
OpenClover: what it does well
- Tracks method, statement and branch coverage.
- Offers more than 20 built-in code metrics.
- Exports reports in five formats.
- Can identify tests to rerun after class changes.
- Supports JUnit, TestNG and Spock.
What to know first
- Groovy is unsupported in Eclipse and IntelliJ integrations.
- Community support replies typically take a few days.
Alternatives to Coverlet Alternatives to OpenClover The whole list