FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Core Impact vs w3af

Both stand on penetration testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Core Impact

Free trial APISelf-hostedWindows

Core Impact combines guided automation, exploit testing, and remediation reporting across several environments. Its Windows deployment and substantial annual pricing make the trial useful for evaluating fit.

Visit Core Impact

w3af

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

w3af offers a free, self-hosted-capable scanner with plugin-based assessment, graphical and console interfaces, and API automation. Its API's default lack of encryption is an important deployment consideration, particularly when it is publicly reachable.

Visit w3af

The facts

Core Impactw3af
Free planA free trialYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WindowsAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planCore Impact Basic: $9,450 a yearFree or on request
Plans published31
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitecoresecurity.comw3af.org
On penetration testing software#21 of 34#17 of 34

Core Impact: what it does well

  • Multi-vector penetration testing
  • Guided Rapid Penetration Tests
  • Commercial-grade exploit library
  • Compliance-mapped remediation reports
  • 30-day trial available

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Runs on Windows systems
  • Basic costs $9,450 a year
  • Listed prices apply to the United States

w3af: what it does well

  • Identifies more than 200 vulnerability types.
  • Provides crawl, audit, and attack plugin stages.
  • Includes GTK and console interfaces.
  • REST API can run in Docker.
  • Free plan costs nothing.

What to know first

  • REST API traffic is unencrypted by default.
  • Public API deployments need additional transport protection.

Alternatives to Core Impact Alternatives to w3af The whole list