FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Conjoon vs meli

Both stand on email clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Conjoon

Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb

Conjoon offers a configurable webmail interface with unified multi-account handling and documented APIs. Its self-hosting model and build dependencies make it better suited to technically capable users than to those seeking a ready-made hosted mailbox.

Visit Conjoon

meli

Free plan LinuxMac

meli offers broad mail-source support and a configurable terminal interface, with useful security features. Its read-only mbox support and limited all-email search are important constraints to weigh.

Visit meli

The facts

Conjoonmeli
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WebLinux, Mac
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteconjoon.orgmeli-email.org
On email clients#107 of 142#111 of 142

Conjoon: what it does well

  • Free open-source web email client
  • Unified inbox for multiple accounts
  • IMAP and SMTP backend support
  • Sound and desktop new-mail notifications
  • Application and component plugin support

What to know first

  • Requires a compatible rest-api-email service
  • Desktop alerts need browser permission
  • Installation requires Node.js 16 or newer
  • Source builds require Sencha Ext JS

meli: what it does well

  • Supports IMAP, Maildir, JMAP and NNTP/Usenet
  • Offers configurable shortcuts, themes and tabs
  • Includes TLS and GPG security features
  • Available free under GPL-3.0

What to know first

  • mbox access is read-only
  • Cannot directly search across all email
  • HTML rendering uses w3m by default

Alternatives to Conjoon Alternatives to meli The whole list