Side by side
CodeThreat vs Joern
Both stand on static application security testing sast. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Visit CodeThreat Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Choose Joern if you need an open-source platform for graph-based code analysis, customizable queries, or CI security scanners. Its breadth of language frontends and API options support varied workflows, but the server should not be treated as a security boundary.
Visit JoernThe facts
| CodeThreat | Joern | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | codethreat.com | joern.io |
| On static application security testing sast | #15 of 24 | #11 of 24 |
CodeThreat: what it does well
Joern: what it does well
- Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binary code.
- Code property graphs support cross-language analysis.
- Includes parsing, taint analysis, and search queries.
- Custom scanners can run in CI.
- Free and open source under Apache-2.0.
What to know first
- Language frontends have varying maturity levels.
- The server does not implement sandboxing.
- JDK 21 is the listed runtime requirement.
Alternatives to CodeThreat Alternatives to Joern The whole list
