Side by side
CodeSonar vs HCL AppScan CodeSweep
Both stand on static application security testing sast. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial LinuxSelf-hostedWeb+1
Choose CodeSonar if you need static analysis across source code and binaries, with support for named security coverage, coding standards, and deployment options. Consider another option if you need a published price before contacting the vendor or cannot meet the stated operating system requirements.
Visit CodeSonar Free plan
Visit HCL AppScan CodeSweep The facts
| CodeSonar | HCL AppScan CodeSweep | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Not published |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | adacore.com | hcl-software.com |
| On static application security testing sast | #13 of 24 | #17 of 24 |
CodeSonar: what it does well
- Analyzes source code and compiled binaries.
- Supports ten listed programming language families.
- Includes pull request scans and custom security rules.
- Integrates with IDEs, project management, and CI/CD workflows.
- Exports custom reports in PDF, HTML, or XML.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- A trial must be requested to evaluate the product.
- Linux support requires glibc 2.39 or higher.
HCL AppScan CodeSweep: what it does well
Alternatives to CodeSonar Alternatives to HCL AppScan CodeSweep The whole list