Side by side

Codeshare vs live-share.nvim

Both stand on pair programming software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Codeshare

Free plan Web

Choose Codeshare for browser-based collaborative coding, interviews, or programming instruction, especially if unlimited collaborators are useful. Look elsewhere if you need a listed platform beyond the web or more than 20 saved Codeshares on a free plan.

Visit Codeshare

live-share.nvim

Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+2

live-share.nvim provides collaborative editing and terminal sharing directly around Neovim. Its transport choices and encryption are useful, while the editing, authentication, and terminal limitations should be understood first.

Visit live-share.nvim

The facts

	Codeshare	live-share.nvim
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Pro: $49 a month	Not published
Plans published	2	None
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	codeshare.io	github.com
On pair programming software	#10 of 26	#14 of 26

Codeshare: what it does well

Share code with colleagues for pair programming and troubleshooting.
Observe candidates completing coding tasks in real time.
Share code with students and peers for teaching.
Both plans include unlimited collaborators.
Pro adds unlimited saved Codeshares and View-Only Mode.

What to know first

The Free plan allows 20 saved Codeshares.
Pro costs $49 a month.
The listed platform is web.

live-share.nvim: what it does well

Free and open source
Read-only or read-write guest roles
Neovim and VS Code collaboration
AES-256-GCM session encryption
Self-hosted tunnel option

What to know first

Requires Neovim 0.9 or later
No authentication beyond URL and host approval
Same-line edits may be overwritten
Reconnecting guests lose terminal scrollback

Alternatives to Codeshare Alternatives to live-share.nvim The whole list