Side by side
CodeLocker vs GaraTrust
Both stand on code signing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
Consider CodeLocker if your team needs signing and provenance controls for software builds, especially in a regulated sector or restricted-network setting. Teams looking for a published price should note that pricing is on request; the site directs prospective customers to arrange a demo or call.
Visit CodeLocker Paid Self-hosted
GaraTrust combines broad artifact support with HSM-backed keys and controlled signing workflows.
Visit GaraTrustThe facts
| CodeLocker | GaraTrust | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | codelocker.zevainc.com | garantir.io |
| On code signing software | #27 of 28 | #23 of 28 |
CodeLocker: what it does well
- Signs commits and binaries, with additional supported targets including scripts and SBOMs.
- Keeps private keys in an HSM.
- Supports multifactor authentication and least-privileged access.
- Provides a step-by-step audit trail for signed source-code verifications.
- Long-term validation supports environments with limited or no internet.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- Getting started involves booking a demo or requesting a call.
GaraTrust: what it does well
- Supports signing across numerous software formats and targets.
- Signing keys stay in non-exportable HSMs.
- Supports CI/CD and developer workstation signing.
- Includes 24/7/365 production support.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- Signing key storage depends on HSMs.
- The signing client sends a hash, not the binary, for signing.
Alternatives to CodeLocker Alternatives to GaraTrust The whole list