Side by side

CodeGuards.io vs Cursor Bugbot

Both stand on code review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CodeGuards.io

Free trial APISelf-hostedWeb

CodeGuards.io combines repository-aware review, security scanning, and team-specific memory with GitLab and GitHub workflows. Its paid plans and trial details should be checked against the deployment and review volume a team needs.

Visit CodeGuards.io

Cursor Bugbot

Free trial APIWeb

Bugbot combines automated pull-request analysis with configurable rules, comments, and optional autofix. Its usage billing and review-size limit are important considerations for teams planning regular code reviews.

Visit Cursor Bugbot

The facts

	CodeGuards.io	Cursor Bugbot
Free plan	A free trial	A free trial
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	API, Self-hosted, Web	API, Web
Lowest paid plan	Code review: €189 a month	Free or on request
Plans published	4	2
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	codeguards.io	cursor.com
On code review software	#41 of 50	#45 of 50

CodeGuards.io: what it does well

Reviews backend, frontend, and infrastructure-as-code risks
Checks whether patches actually close vulnerabilities
Stores repository conventions and historical decisions
Supports GitLab, GitHub, CI, Slack, and MCP
Offers self-hosted deployment and review analytics

What to know first

No free plan
Plans start at €189 a month
Enterprise pricing is custom
Trial terms list both 3-day and 14-day offers

Cursor Bugbot: what it does well

Reviews pull-request diffs automatically or manually
Explains findings and suggests fixes
Supports custom repository and project rules
Offers Autofix through a Cloud Agent
Connects to major code hosts

What to know first

No free plan is listed
Billing is usage-based
Very large pull requests are skipped
Extra reviews use on-demand spend

Alternatives to CodeGuards.io Alternatives to Cursor Bugbot The whole list