Side by side
Codebolt vs muxd
Both stand on ai coding assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+3
Codebolt combines agent orchestration with desktop, cloud, CLI, SDK, and self-hosted deployment paths. Its free local tier and permission controls are useful starting points, while the absence of listed code completion may matter to some developers.
Visit Codebolt Free plan APIiPhoneLinux+4
muxd combines terminal coding assistance with broad provider support, local session storage, and reversible git checkpoints. Its free software model leaves provider keys and usage costs for the user to manage.
Visit muxdThe facts
| Codebolt | muxd | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | codebolt.ai | muxd.sh |
| On ai coding assistants | #36 of 103 | #40 of 103 |
Codebolt: what it does well
- Desktop workspace includes editor, terminal, and browser
- Cloud workspaces require no installation
- Headless CLI mode supports CI/CD
- Agent handoffs verify work
- Free local tier available
What to know first
- Supported IDE is Codebolt Editor
- Agent permissions require configured allowlists
- Some integrations use MCP servers or webhooks
muxd: what it does well
- Free plan and Apache 2.0 software
- 41 tools across 21 categories
- Sessions resume, branch, and search
- Git checkpoints support undo and redo
- No telemetry or usage data collected
What to know first
- Requires git and a provider API key
- Provider usage costs are configured by users
- Full-auto still blocks sensitive paths
Alternatives to Codebolt Alternatives to muxd The whole list