Side by side
Clover vs LCOV
Both stand on code coverage tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan
Visit Clover Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
LCOV offers detailed coverage reporting and filtering for supported codebases, with HTML and .info output. Installation requires Perl and related packages, while the optional XS extension has an additional compiler requirement.
Visit LCOVThe facts
| Clover | LCOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Atlassian | Not published |
| Website | atlassian.com | github.com |
| On code coverage tools | #8 of 10 | #4 of 10 |
Clover: what it does well
LCOV: what it does well
- HTML reports include colored rates, graphs, and hyperlinks
- Supports differential coverage reporting
- Can filter code and compiler-generated branch artifacts
- Parallel processing can use multiple cores
- GPL-2.0 licensed and free
What to know first
- Linux platform only
- Requires Perl and multiple Perl packages
- Optional XS extension requires a C++20-capable compiler