FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

CloudShark vs CommView

Both stand on network packet analyzer software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CloudShark

Paid APISelf-hostedWeb

CloudShark focuses on organizing and analyzing stored captures, with repository search, automation, and several deployment options. Buyers should account for its paid, request-priced model and the absence of live capture.

Visit CloudShark

CommView

Free trial Windows

CommView provides extensive packet and protocol analysis for Windows, including session reconstruction, alarms, decryption, and remote capture. Choose licensing carefully if the VoIP analyzer is required, and note the listed platform limitation.

Visit CommView

The facts

CloudSharkCommView
Free planNoA free trial
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WebWindows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestCommView 1 Year Time-Limited License: $149 a year
Plans published14
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitesupport.qacafe.comtamos.com
On network packet analyzer software#29 of 32#25 of 32

CloudShark: what it does well

  • Deep Search works across a packet repository
  • Supports Wireshark display filters and protocol dissectors
  • API uses token authentication and configurable permissions
  • Cortex XSOAR can correlate IDS alerts with packets
  • Supports OVA, AWS, Docker, and Kubernetes deployment

What to know first

  • No free plan is listed
  • Live capture is not supported
  • Decoder loads 400,000 packets at a time
  • Pricing requires a request

CommView: what it does well

  • Decodes over 70 protocols
  • Packet filtering, saving, import, and export
  • Traffic decryption and flow analysis
  • PCAP and remote capture support
  • 30-day evaluation period

What to know first

  • Windows platform only
  • No free plan
  • Standard license excludes VoIP analyzer

Alternatives to CloudShark Alternatives to CommView The whole list