Side by side
ClassPoint vs Imakiku
Both stand on audience response systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan WebWindows
ClassPoint keeps its engagement features within a PowerPoint presentation and offers a web app for presenters. Check the plan limits and Windows requirements against your teaching setup before choosing it.
Visit ClassPoint Free plan AndroidiPhoneWeb
Imakiku combines live questions, comments, surveys, and quizzes with browser-based joining. Its free functions cover core interaction, while paid plans and extensions add larger or more specialized workflows.
Visit ImakikuThe facts
| ClassPoint | Imakiku | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web, Windows | Android, iPhone, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Pro: $8 a month | See the plans |
| Plans published | 3 | 10 |
| Maker | Not published | Imakiku |
| Website | classpoint.io | imakiku.com |
| On audience response systems | #42 of 118 | #46 of 118 |
ClassPoint: what it does well
- Works inside PowerPoint
- Offers multiple interactive question formats
- Includes gamification tools such as badges and leaderboards
- Presenter web app is listed in every plan
What to know first
- Windows installer requires Windows 10 and Office 2013 or higher
- Basic is limited to 25 participants and five questions per presentation
Imakiku: what it does well
- QR-code joining requires no app installation
- Live polling, Q&A, quizzes, and results
- Free plan includes question and comment tools
- Supports Android, iOS, and web
- Optional translation and branching extensions
What to know first
- Listed audience limit is 100
- Paid features require a paid plan
- Some plans have participant or monthly caps
Alternatives to ClassPoint Alternatives to Imakiku The whole list