Side by side
Cisco Catalyst Center vs Zentera CoIP Access Platform
Both stand on microsegmentation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxMac+3
Visit Cisco Catalyst Center Paid APILinuxMac+2
Choose CoIP Access Platform if your enterprise needs centralized Zero Trust access controls, multiple deployment options, and application-level segmentation and encryption. Organizations that need data-at-rest protection should plan to use third-party security tools or architectures for that requirement.
Visit Zentera CoIP Access PlatformThe facts
| Cisco Catalyst Center | Zentera CoIP Access Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cisco.com | zentera.net |
| On microsegmentation software | #12 of 31 | #16 of 31 |
Cisco Catalyst Center: what it does well
Zentera CoIP Access Platform: what it does well
- Central policy management is available through GUI and API.
- Supports agent-based, agentless, and Gatekeeper deployments.
- Virtual Chambers segment traffic and cloak protected endpoints.
- Application-specific encrypted links are created for approved traffic.
- Application logs can be exported to Splunk and ELK.
What to know first
- Pricing requires contacting Zentera.
- The platform does not natively enforce data-at-rest security.
Alternatives to Cisco Catalyst Center Alternatives to Zentera CoIP Access Platform The whole list