FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

chruby vs Docksal

Both stand on development environment managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

chruby

Free plan LinuxMac

chruby offers shell-based Ruby version selection with optional directory-based switching and several documented installation routes. Consider its lack of cd hooks and executable shims when choosing how you want version changes to work.

Visit chruby

Docksal

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

Docksal organizes isolated Docker development environments across major desktop operating systems. Its bundled tooling, boilerplates, and service support cover many CMS and framework workflows, but setup requirements and permissions should be reviewed first.

Visit Docksal

The facts

chrubyDocksal
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, MacLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestNot published
Plans published1None
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comdocksal.io
On development environment managers#10 of 50#14 of 50

chruby: what it does well

  • Updates PATH, GEM_HOME, and GEM_PATH
  • Supports fuzzy matching of installed Rubies
  • Optional switching based on .ruby-version files
  • Supports bash 3 or later and zsh
  • MIT licensed

What to know first

  • Does not hook cd
  • Does not install executable shims
  • Automatic switching is off by default

Docksal: what it does well

  • Free development environment
  • Separates projects and stack versions
  • Includes broad PHP and JavaScript tooling
  • Supports additional Docker services
  • Offers CMS boilerplates

What to know first

  • Requires 8 GB or more RAM
  • Installer needs administrative privileges
  • Windows requires Windows 10 and hardware virtualization
  • SSH proxy can expose keys to local users

Alternatives to chruby Alternatives to Docksal The whole list