Side by side
Checkmarx IDE Plugins vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer
Both stand on ide code security plugins. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
Visit Checkmarx IDE Plugins Paid LinuxSelf-hostedWindows
Choose Fortify Static Code Analyzer if your team needs static vulnerability analysis across the listed languages, application types, and vulnerability categories, with AI insights and automated fix suggestions. Buyers focused on open-source library risks should also consider OpenText SCA tools, which identify those risks.
Visit Fortify Static Code AnalyzerThe facts
| Checkmarx IDE Plugins | Fortify Static Code Analyzer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Linux, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | checkmarx.com | opentext.com |
| On ide code security plugins | #16 of 19 | #12 of 19 |
Checkmarx IDE Plugins: what it does well
Fortify Static Code Analyzer: what it does well
- Analyzes source code, bytecode, or binaries.
- Coverage spans 44+ languages and 350+ frameworks.
- Assesses 1,524+ vulnerability categories.
- Offers AI-driven insights and automated fix suggestions.
- Supports SaaS, private-hosted, and off-cloud deployment.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- SAST primarily analyzes proprietary code; open-source risks are identified by OpenText SCA tools.
Alternatives to Checkmarx IDE Plugins Alternatives to Fortify Static Code Analyzer The whole list