Side by side
Chapar vs Restfox
Both stand on api clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose Chapar if you want a free desktop client spanning REST, gRPC, and GraphQL, with scripts and CI-run test cases. Look elsewhere if you need a project beyond early beta or a mock server without the stated shared-service limits.
Visit Chapar
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+3
Restfox provides a broad set of request, scripting, plugin, and collection features without a paid plan. Its desktop-only local-file method is the main documented limitation.
Visit RestfoxThe facts
| Chapar | Restfox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | chapar.rest | restfox.dev |
| On api clients | #23 of 38 | #19 of 38 |
Chapar: what it does well
- Free and open source, with builds for three desktop operating systems.
- Supports REST, gRPC, and GraphQL requests.
- Python scripts can run before and after requests.
- Test cases can run in CI with chapar-cli.
- YAML configuration can be reviewed and shared through git.
What to know first
- Early beta project under active development.
- Environment variables are stored as files and may remain on disk when sharing data.
- Shared mock API has request-rate, concurrency, and body-size limits.
Restfox: what it does well
- Free and MIT-licensed
- HTTP, GraphQL, and WebSocket requests
- JavaScript automation tests
- Postman and Insomnia collection export
- Docker self-hosting support
What to know first
- Local-file plugin reading is desktop-only
- Offline-first scope may not fit every workflow
Alternatives to Chapar Alternatives to Restfox The whole list