FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Ceph vs openmediavault

Both stand on storage management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Ceph

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Ceph brings several storage types and replication capabilities into a system organizations operate on their own hardware. Its deployment and production guidance point to infrastructure requirements readers should account for.

Visit Ceph

openmediavault

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted

openmediavault combines NAS administration, file services, storage features and monitoring in a free Debian-based package. Check the installation requirements and the Kubernetes plugin dependency if the app catalog matters to your setup.

Visit openmediavault

The facts

Cephopenmediavault
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WindowsAPI, Linux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteceph.ioopenmediavault.org
On storage management software#2 of 28#6 of 28

Ceph: what it does well

  • Combines object, block, and file storage.
  • RGW supports the S3 API.
  • Includes versioning, lifecycle rules, and immutability.
  • Can replicate across geographic locations.
  • Free plan listed as free.

What to know first

  • Requires organizations to choose and manage cluster hardware.
  • cephadm requires Python 3 and systemd.
  • Production guidance calls for 10 Gb/s networking between hosts.

openmediavault: what it does well

  • Web-based NAS administration
  • Includes SSH, NFS, SMB/CIFS and RSync
  • Supports software RAID and Btrfs snapshots
  • Plugins add backup and security services
  • Free software under GNU GPL v3

What to know first

  • App catalog requires the Kubernetes plugin
  • Installation instructions specify Debian 13 or AMD64 hardware
  • Provided without warranty

Alternatives to Ceph Alternatives to openmediavault The whole list