Side by side
Ceph vs JuiceFS
Both stand on distributed file system software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Ceph brings several storage types and replication capabilities into a system organizations operate on their own hardware. Its deployment and production guidance point to infrastructure requirements readers should account for.
Visit Ceph Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2
JuiceFS combines a distributed file system with multiple storage and protocol integrations, and offers both self-hosted and managed editions. Consider its at-rest encryption limits and enable that option when creating a file system if needed.
Visit JuiceFSThe facts
| Ceph | JuiceFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Cloud Service: $0.02 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | ceph.io | juicefs.com |
| On distributed file system software | #2 of 32 | #1 of 32 |
Ceph: what it does well
- Combines object, block, and file storage.
- RGW supports the S3 API.
- Includes versioning, lifecycle rules, and immutability.
- Can replicate across geographic locations.
- Free plan listed as free.
What to know first
- Requires organizations to choose and manage cluster hardware.
- cephadm requires Python 3 and systemd.
- Production guidance calls for 10 Gb/s networking between hosts.
JuiceFS: what it does well
- Supports POSIX, HDFS, S3, and WebDAV protocols.
- Integrates with Kubernetes CSI and Hadoop components.
- Offers self-hosted, managed, and Enterprise editions.
- Supports encryption in transit and at rest.
- Community Edition is free.
What to know first
- At-rest encryption must be enabled at file-system creation.
- At-rest encryption excludes cached data and file metadata.
- WSL 2 is recommended for Windows use.