Side by side
cccc vs Qodana
Both stand on code complexity analyzers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit cccc 
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4
Qodana combines code analysis, pipeline gates, and multiple deployment options. Its contributor-based licensing minimum is worth factoring into plan selection.
Visit QodanaThe facts
| cccc | Qodana | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | No |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Ultimate: $5 a month |
| Plans published | None | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | jetbrains.com |
| On code complexity analyzers | #9 of 18 | #5 of 18 |
cccc: what it does well
Qodana: what it does well
- Baselines mark issues as new, unchanged, or resolved
- Quality gates can block CI/CD pipelines
- Supports major IDEs and listed CI integrations
- Self-hosted deployment offers Docker and Kubernetes options
What to know first
- Licenses require a minimum of three contributors
- Pricing is based on active contributors over 90 days
- Docker deployment requires Linux, Docker Engine, and Docker Swarm