Side by side
Cavisson NetStorm vs Goose
Both stand on performance testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial LinuxSelf-hostedWeb
NetStorm offers load modeling, client-side reporting and diagnostic comparisons, with on-premise deployment and Jenkins support. Confirm pricing and trial terms with Cavisson, and note that some protocol support is still on the roadmap.
Visit Cavisson NetStorm Free plan Self-hosted
Goose provides code-driven load testing with aggregated metrics and flexible deployment. Teams should consider its Rust workflow and incomplete control interface before adopting it.
Visit GooseThe facts
| Cavisson NetStorm | Goose | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cavisson.com | tag1.com |
| On performance testing software | #26 of 38 | #22 of 38 |
Cavisson NetStorm: what it does well
- Models load by arrival rate or concurrent user count
- WAN simulation includes delay, loss and packet reordering
- Reports include rendering time and caching metrics
- Script converter retains predefined functions
What to know first
- Pricing is available only on request
- Flex, MQTT and SIP are marked as roadmap items
Goose: what it does well
- Open-source Apache-2.0 license
- Rust tests can use all CPU cores
- Supports Manager and Worker distributed tests
- Aggregates metrics into comparison reports
- Self-hosted and on-premise deployment
What to know first
- Tests require Rust coding
- Browser-based testing is not supported
- Full control-and-monitoring UI remains in progress
- Dashboard is opt-in
Alternatives to Cavisson NetStorm Alternatives to Goose The whole list