Side by side
cargo-dist vs Octopus Deploy
Both stand on release automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit cargo-dist 
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+2
Octopus Deploy combines release orchestration and automation with self-managed and hosted options. Compare the tier limits, annual costs, and support coverage with your deployment needs.
Visit Octopus DeployThe facts
| cargo-dist | Octopus Deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Professional: $4,330 a year |
| Plans published | None | 6 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | octopus.com |
| On release automation tools | #11 of 34 | #7 of 34 |
cargo-dist: what it does well
Octopus Deploy: what it does well
- Supports rolling, blue/green, and canary deployments
- Deploys to Kubernetes and major cloud platforms
- Available self-managed or as hosted Octopus Cloud
- Includes built-in encryption, auditing, and role-based access control
What to know first
- Free tier is capped at 10 projects, tenants, machines, and users
- Professional costs $4,330 a year
- Enterprise costs $24,600 a year
- Self-hosted Server requires SQL Server 2016+ or Azure SQL
Alternatives to cargo-dist Alternatives to Octopus Deploy The whole list