Side by side
Camunda vs Heym
Both stand on ai workflow automation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+3
Visit Camunda 
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Choose Heym if your AI, platform, or automation team wants to build and govern workflows on infrastructure you control, with human review and detailed execution traces. Look elsewhere if you need to resell the software as a paid service; its Commons Clause plus MIT license disallows that.
Visit HeymThe facts
| Camunda | Heym | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | camunda.com | heym.run |
| On ai workflow automation software | #3 of 30 | #7 of 30 |
Camunda: what it does well
Heym: what it does well
- Free to use with no licensing fees or usage limits.
- Build workflows on a visual canvas or through natural language or voice.
- Orchestrates named sub-agents and sub-workflows across up to five nesting levels.
- Human checkpoints can accept, edit, or refuse work before it resumes.
- Supports Docker Compose or Kubernetes self-hosting.
What to know first
- Requires self-hosting on infrastructure the user controls.
- The source-available license prohibits reselling it as a paid service.
- Support packages and enterprise engagements may be paid services.