Side by side
CADIMA vs ReviewAid
Both stand on systematic review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
CADIMA brings review documentation, collaborative screening, and evidence synthesis guidance into a free web tool. Its listed version date and the planned status of archiving are worth noting when deciding whether it fits a project.
Visit CADIMA Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2
ReviewAid provides configurable screening and extraction assistance, with confidence flags and several export formats. Its maker explicitly positions it as a supplement to manual review, and submissions have article limits.
Visit ReviewAidThe facts
| CADIMA | ReviewAid | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cadima.info | reviewaid.github.io |
| On systematic review software | #7 of 30 | #11 of 30 |
CADIMA: what it does well
- Free plan with no topic restrictions stated.
- Worldwide teamwork with no stated reviewer limit.
- Automated record allocation during screening.
- Automatic duplicate removal and bulk PDF upload.
- Documents the review process.
What to know first
- Web platform only.
- Site identifies version 2.2.4.2, dated April 2023.
- Archiving review and evidence map data is described as planned.
ReviewAid: what it does well
- Classifies papers against user-provided PICO criteria.
- Users define the fields for data extraction.
- Exports results as CSV, XLSX, or DOCX.
- Local Ollama keeps paper text on the machine.
What to know first
- Full-text screening is limited to 10 articles per submission.
- Extraction is limited to 20 articles per submission.
- The hosted app may take about 30 seconds to initialize.
Alternatives to CADIMA Alternatives to ReviewAid The whole list