Side by side
BugLens vs Mira
Both stand on pull request automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Choose BugLens if you want automatic GitHub reviews with security analysis and fix suggestions, starting with a free plan for one repository. Starter is the option to consider for private repositories and context-aware reviews; teams seeking organization-wide features must wait for the Team plan.
Visit BugLens
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
Mira offers contextual reviews, security checks, and feedback-derived rules for teams prepared to self-host. Confirm that your code host is supported and account for direct model-provider costs.
Visit MiraThe facts
| BugLens | Mira | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter: $19 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 3 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | buglens.app | miracode.ai |
| On pull request automation tools | #18 of 29 | #14 of 29 |
BugLens: what it does well
- Automatic reviews run on GitHub.
- Security analysis and custom review rules are available.
- Fix suggestions are included.
- Free plan covers one repository and 50 monthly AI reviews.
- Starter includes private repositories and priority analysis.
What to know first
- Free use is limited to one repository and 50 AI reviews monthly.
- Private repository support is on the $19 per month Starter plan.
- Team is waitlist-only and marked “Soon”.
Mira: what it does well
- Uses indexed project context beyond the diff
- Includes secret scanning and OSV package checks
- Supports GitHub, GitLab, and Forgejo
- Free plan includes all features
What to know first
- Self-hosting is the only deployment option
- Bitbucket support is planned, not available
- Users pay model-provider costs directly